Comments on: Friends Only: an actual discussion http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/ cum grano salis Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:31:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3 By: Scatman Dan http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-148 Scatman Dan Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:58:49 +0000 http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-148 Ah; you bastard, you beat me to this post. Ah; you bastard, you beat me to this post.

]]> By: andy r http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-149 andy r Thu, 09 Mar 2006 11:39:31 +0000 http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-149 much better. I don't think I disagree with a single thing you've said there. balanced well reasoned, not bitchy. thank you. I'll just reproduce this little bit from my comment-to-your-comment-in-my-LJ, for the benefit of people who can't (and won't be allowed) to read my LJ. "I've balanced up the value of keeping the words I've written available to me and the guaranteed safety of deleting the whole thing - along with three years of memories, and this (hiding all my old entries and going 'friends only') is a happy medium." much better. I don’t think I disagree with a single thing you’ve said there. balanced well reasoned, not bitchy. thank you.

I’ll just reproduce this little bit from my comment-to-your-comment-in-my-LJ, for the benefit of people who can’t (and won’t be allowed) to read my LJ.

“I’ve balanced up the value of keeping the words I’ve written available to me and the guaranteed safety of deleting the whole thing - along with three years of memories, and this (hiding all my old entries and going ‘friends only’) is a happy medium.”

]]> By: Eskoala http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-150 Eskoala Thu, 09 Mar 2006 11:54:24 +0000 http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-150 Aye, the original post honestly was just about why my blog is public, it was never meant to be any sort of dig at anyone, though I can see that linking to JonA didn't help that idea. He simply provided me with the impetus to explain myself. I only did that because I needed to finish the sentence "in reference to" of the mock covering letter. This post is an actual argument, rather than just a presented opinion, as as such is probably more use to you all. Aye, the original post honestly was just about why my blog is public, it was never meant to be any sort of dig at anyone, though I can see that linking to JonA didn’t help that idea. He simply provided me with the impetus to explain myself. I only did that because I needed to finish the sentence “in reference to” of the mock covering letter.

This post is an actual argument, rather than just a presented opinion, as as such is probably more use to you all.

]]> By: Jon http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-151 Jon Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:05:29 +0000 http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-151 I agree. Linking to my blog always gives a feeling of negativity to anything. --Jon I agree. Linking to my blog always gives a feeling of negativity to anything.

–Jon

]]> By: Eskoala http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-152 Eskoala Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:11:00 +0000 http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-152 You're so right. You’re so right.

]]> By: Suz http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-153 Suz Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:23:44 +0000 http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-153 All fair points, except for the last one. I have never in my life used the word blog to describe my journal. Just wanted that you know that, which I am sure you do. All fair points, except for the last one. I have never in my life used the word blog to describe my journal. Just wanted that you know that, which I am sure you do.

]]> By: Suz http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-154 Suz Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:25:41 +0000 http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-154 And that wasn't meant to be a mean comment or a retort or anything. I think your argument is fair and I can see your point, whether I share your views or not. So thanks. And that wasn’t meant to be a mean comment or a retort or anything. I think your argument is fair and I can see your point, whether I share your views or not. So thanks.

]]> By: Becky http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-156 Becky Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:27:05 +0000 http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-156 Dan: I can't comment on you blog either. I dont have anything to "Log in" with. Dan: I can’t comment on you blog either. I dont have anything to “Log in” with.

]]> By: Becky http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-157 Becky Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:28:30 +0000 http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-157 Oh yeah, sorry about how irelivant that was to the discussion! Oh yeah, sorry about how irelivant that was to the discussion!

]]> By: johnny2sheds http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-565 johnny2sheds Sun, 16 Apr 2006 12:54:41 +0000 http://nowebsite.co.uk/blog/2006/03/friends-only-an-actual-discussion/#comment-565 well i did try and access but no luck well i did try and access but no luck

]]>